EDuke32 is an awesome, free homebrew game engine and source port of the classic PC first person shooter Duke Nukem 3D— Duke3D for short—to Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, FreeBSD, several handhelds, your family toaster, and to your girlfriend's vibrator. We've added thousands of cool and useful features and upgrades for regular players and additional editing capabilities and scripting extensions. Building EDuke32 on Mac OS X Hendricks266. Weaponized Autism #31 Posted 19 July 2011 - 02:30 PM. Duke3d, on 19 July 2011 - 01:12 PM, said: the computer is a G5. Eduke32osx-sdl2lionintelsvn6110.dmg 10196KB Apr 08 2017 12:28:56 AM. I forgot their names, but over at the PPC MacRumors forums, there were threads dedicated to compiling info and download links for every final version of every program made, one thread per major Mac OS X release (Cheetah, Puma, Jaguar, Panther, Tiger and Leopard).
I see, though since additions don't detract from Tiger, the lack of core-image support etc. applies equally to Panther, as well. I also have never been unable to run something in Tiger due to lack of RAM, CPU usage or VRAM that I wouldn't have on Panther, since the two systems don't leave that different a footprint.
Eduke32osx-sdl2yosemiteintelsvn8000.dmg 9071KB Aug 14 2019 11:27:39 PM eduke32osx-sdlleopardsvn3898.dmg 4160KB Nov 20 2013 12:20:27 AM eduke32osx-sdlleopardsvn4075.dmg 4161KB Nov 17 2013 01:27:46 AM.
Nearly all games that require Tiger, from my experience, have run just fine on the mini, though it should be noted mine are the 1.5 GHz model, which also comes with twice the VRAM (64MB instead of 32MB). So maybe that could potentially be a point for the other minis. But since Tiger runs fine with no practical difference what Panther runs fine, I still don't see this as a point to Panther's defense, personally, even for the more modest minis.
I, too, am a fan of pre-Tiger flavors (and I have near-zero interest for anything Intel Mac, including 10.6.8 Snow Leopard), so much that neither Tiger nor Leopard are my go-to systems on the minis: It is Mac OS 9.2.2, which, on top of having crazy software compatibility and system responsiveness, it has the lowest RAM, CPU usage & VRAM requirements, and all mini models have ATI GPUs compatible with hardware acceleration under it, using the latest 2005 drivers.
(In case I haven't mentioned it to you yet in some other post, you can download Mac OS 9.2.2 for the G4 minis from the MacOS9Lives forums.)
I see, though since additions don't detract from Tiger, the lack of core-image support etc. applies equally to Panther, as well. I also have never been unable to run something in Tiger due to lack of RAM, CPU usage or VRAM that I wouldn't have on Panther, since the two systems don't leave that different a footprint.
Nearly all games that require Tiger, from my experience, have run just fine on the mini, though it should be noted mine are the 1.5 GHz model, which also comes with twice the VRAM (64MB instead of 32MB). So maybe that could potentially be a point for the other minis. But since Tiger runs fine with no practical difference what Panther runs fine, I still don't see this as a point to Panther's defense, personally, even for the more modest minis.
Eduke32 For Macbook Air
I, too, am a fan of pre-Tiger flavors (and I have near-zero interest for anything Intel Mac, including 10.6.8 Snow Leopard), so much that neither Tiger nor Leopard are my go-to systems on the minis: It is Mac OS 9.2.2, which, on top of having crazy software compatibility and system responsiveness, it has the lowest RAM, CPU usage & VRAM requirements, and all mini models have ATI GPUs compatible with hardware acceleration under it, using the latest 2005 drivers.
(In case I haven't mentioned it to you yet in some other post, you can download Mac OS 9.2.2 for the G4 minis from the MacOS9Lives forums.)